<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction to Unity Launcher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tayroni Alves</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/comment-page-2/#comment-22474</link>
		<dc:creator>Tayroni Alves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=3594#comment-22474</guid>
		<description>Please, make the launcher movable or place the launcher on the screen bottom when on portrait resolution mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, make the launcher movable or place the launcher on the screen bottom when on portrait resolution mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayal Kırıklığımın Adı : Ubuntu 11.04 &#124; Aziz Ünsal Blog</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/comment-page-2/#comment-20443</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayal Kırıklığımın Adı : Ubuntu 11.04 &#124; Aziz Ünsal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=3594#comment-20443</guid>
		<description>[...] Bu arkadaşlar bir şekilde GNOME&#8217;u bırakıp kendilerince bir desktop environment icat etmişler, Unity! Bu Unity&#8217;nin en çarpıcı özelliği de o meşhur Launcher&#8216;ı. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bu arkadaşlar bir şekilde GNOME&#8217;u bırakıp kendilerince bir desktop environment icat etmişler, Unity! Bu Unity&#8217;nin en çarpıcı özelliği de o meşhur Launcher&#8216;ı. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S04th</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/comment-page-2/#comment-18976</link>
		<dc:creator>S04th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=3594#comment-18976</guid>
		<description>One word for why pinning the launcher to the right, even with auto-hide, is moronic: synergy.

That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One word for why pinning the launcher to the right, even with auto-hide, is moronic: synergy.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanzador de Unity</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/comment-page-2/#comment-18600</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanzador de Unity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=3594#comment-18600</guid>
		<description>[...] información en: http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] información en: <a href="http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/" rel="nofollow">http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/comment-page-2/#comment-16273</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 05:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=3594#comment-16273</guid>
		<description>I think you have done an amazing job. I have always felt that the linux community has so much to offer but that is really lacked was in fact &quot;unity&quot;. it has really re-invented ubuntu for me because of how much more I enjoy this gui. additionally this could really use a settings manager allowing specific comfiz settings that won interfere with the unity launcher. but its great :D good job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have done an amazing job. I have always felt that the linux community has so much to offer but that is really lacked was in fact &#8220;unity&#8221;. it has really re-invented ubuntu for me because of how much more I enjoy this gui. additionally this could really use a settings manager allowing specific comfiz settings that won interfere with the unity launcher. but its great <img src='http://design.canonical.com/wp-content/themes/canonical-design/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.png' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  good job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAB</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/comment-page-2/#comment-15771</link>
		<dc:creator>DAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 14:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=3594#comment-15771</guid>
		<description>I am glad somebody is building a desktop for touchscreens on Linux. No, really, I am. But why should I, when NOT using a touchscreen, be forced to use such an interface? For use with my netbook with a boring old touchpad, I would prefer to have things back just the way they were, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad somebody is building a desktop for touchscreens on Linux. No, really, I am. But why should I, when NOT using a touchscreen, be forced to use such an interface? For use with my netbook with a boring old touchpad, I would prefer to have things back just the way they were, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/comment-page-2/#comment-15618</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=3594#comment-15618</guid>
		<description>The only one single redeeming thing for Ubuntu is this: in 11.04 I can still switch to Classic Desktop and ditch Unity.

That&#039;s it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only one single redeeming thing for Ubuntu is this: in 11.04 I can still switch to Classic Desktop and ditch Unity.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Full Circle Podcast #9: Playing a Unicycle and the Trombone out now &#171; Everything Express</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/comment-page-2/#comment-15316</link>
		<dc:creator>Full Circle Podcast #9: Playing a Unicycle and the Trombone out now &#171; Everything Express</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=3594#comment-15316</guid>
		<description>[...] Canonical Design team, Introduction to unity Launcher [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canonical Design team, Introduction to unity Launcher [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalcProgrammer1</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/comment-page-2/#comment-12886</link>
		<dc:creator>CalcProgrammer1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 05:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=3594#comment-12886</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand...Netbooks have smaller screens and so your intuitive way to improve the user experience is to make the icons BIGGER?  Wasting even more screen area?  This looks great for people with touchscreens, but for all the rest of us who use Ubuntu on normal computers with keyboard and mouse it is just unnecessary screen clutter.  It NEEDS to be optional or at least able to move to the bottom and be smaller (normal taskbar sized).  Also, there needs to be an option to display the program title, not just the icon.  Finally, make the Mac-style menu bar relocation optional.  On a large monitor there is no reason to make the interface annoying.  It might be shiny but if it is still in its current (option-lacking) state by 11.04&#039;s release I&#039;m sticking with GNOME like many others who have stated similar thoughts.  I think Canonical pulled the trigger a bit too early on this one, the Ubuntu Netbook Edition is always there for people who want it (though Touchscreen or Tablet edition might make more sense).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand&#8230;Netbooks have smaller screens and so your intuitive way to improve the user experience is to make the icons BIGGER?  Wasting even more screen area?  This looks great for people with touchscreens, but for all the rest of us who use Ubuntu on normal computers with keyboard and mouse it is just unnecessary screen clutter.  It NEEDS to be optional or at least able to move to the bottom and be smaller (normal taskbar sized).  Also, there needs to be an option to display the program title, not just the icon.  Finally, make the Mac-style menu bar relocation optional.  On a large monitor there is no reason to make the interface annoying.  It might be shiny but if it is still in its current (option-lacking) state by 11.04&#8242;s release I&#8217;m sticking with GNOME like many others who have stated similar thoughts.  I think Canonical pulled the trigger a bit too early on this one, the Ubuntu Netbook Edition is always there for people who want it (though Touchscreen or Tablet edition might make more sense).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 15 Preguntas sobre Unity que deberias saber &#171; Ubuntu Life</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/introduction-to-unity-launcher/comment-page-2/#comment-10527</link>
		<dc:creator>15 Preguntas sobre Unity que deberias saber &#171; Ubuntu Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=3594#comment-10527</guid>
		<description>[...] Puedes leer más sobre el tema en el siguiente enlace. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Puedes leer más sobre el tema en el siguiente enlace. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

