<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Native readers: extending the Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sladen</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-18505</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sladen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6001#comment-18505</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Gugum Gumilar:&lt;/b&gt; It would certainly be desirable to have &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; Sundanese font coverage.  Currently the only font I have installed which covers Sundanese (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundanese_alphabet&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aksara Swara&lt;/a&gt;).  Please could you file a wishlist bug on the bug-tracker so that we can track it all in one place:

&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-family/+filebug?field.title=Wishlist:+Add+support+for+Sundanese+Aksara+Swara&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-family/+filebug?field.title=Wishlist: Add support for Sundanese Aksara Swara&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1B80.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.unicode.org/charts/U1B80.pdf&lt;/a&gt; (Sunanese)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

The main think is to find a Sundanese font designer familiar with the intricacies of the script and a group of testers (such as yourself) who would be able to review the script coverage on an everyday basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Gugum Gumilar:</b> It would certainly be desirable to have <em>good</em> Sundanese font coverage.  Currently the only font I have installed which covers Sundanese (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundanese_alphabet" rel="nofollow">Aksara Swara</a>).  Please could you file a wishlist bug on the bug-tracker so that we can track it all in one place:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-family/+filebug?field.title=Wishlist:+Add+support+for+Sundanese+Aksara+Swara" rel="nofollow">launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-family/+filebug?field.title=Wishlist: Add support for Sundanese Aksara Swara</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1B80.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.unicode.org/charts/U1B80.pdf</a> (Sunanese)</li>
</ul>
<p>The main think is to find a Sundanese font designer familiar with the intricacies of the script and a group of testers (such as yourself) who would be able to review the script coverage on an everyday basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gugum Gumilar</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-18428</link>
		<dc:creator>Gugum Gumilar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 05:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6001#comment-18428</guid>
		<description>Sundanese Fonts please. They&#039;d been registered but don&#039;t have any good-looking default fonts like arial. I hove sundanese font can be include into ubuntu font.

ps
info about sundanese font can be found on wikipedia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sundanese Fonts please. They&#8217;d been registered but don&#8217;t have any good-looking default fonts like arial. I hove sundanese font can be include into ubuntu font.</p>
<p>ps<br />
info about sundanese font can be found on wikipedia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: محمد نجم</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>محمد نجم</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6001#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>So there will be an Arabic Glyphs soon after Maverick release  ?
finally a GOOD UI FONT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So there will be an Arabic Glyphs soon after Maverick release  ?<br />
finally a GOOD UI FONT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6001#comment-1809</guid>
		<description>Artir:

It worked fine in Photoshop but not in the browser. Some parts of the font are thicker and other thiners.

Thankyou.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artir:</p>
<p>It worked fine in Photoshop but not in the browser. Some parts of the font are thicker and other thiners.</p>
<p>Thankyou.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artir</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>artir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6001#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>The version posted on OMGbuntu works fine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The version posted on OMGbuntu works fine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6001#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>Are latin symbols supported?

á é í ó ú ü

Because I have a pirate version of the font which doesn&#039;t. Theese closed betas really suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are latin symbols supported?</p>
<p>á é í ó ú ü</p>
<p>Because I have a pirate version of the font which doesn&#8217;t. Theese closed betas really suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariano Pavone</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariano Pavone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6001#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>Now that the hinting patents have expired (http://freetype.sourceforge.net/patents.html) is Ubuntu going to use the fretype&#039;s bytecode interpreter by default?
In that case, are you testing the new font with or without using that feature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the hinting patents have expired (<a href="http://freetype.sourceforge.net/patents.html" rel="nofollow">http://freetype.sourceforge.net/patents.html</a>) is Ubuntu going to use the fretype&#8217;s bytecode interpreter by default?<br />
In that case, are you testing the new font with or without using that feature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elavdeveloper</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>elavdeveloper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6001#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>Hi:
I wonder (if possible) when we can test the new font, as it is fully functional for the English language. I would also like to know how we can collaborate.

Excuse my bad English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi:<br />
I wonder (if possible) when we can test the new font, as it is fully functional for the English language. I would also like to know how we can collaborate.</p>
<p>Excuse my bad English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivanka Majic</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1681</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivanka Majic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6001#comment-1681</guid>
		<description>@Ddorda Arabic and Hebrew won&#039;t be done until after the Maverick release. We will keep you posted!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ddorda Arabic and Hebrew won&#8217;t be done until after the Maverick release. We will keep you posted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ddorda</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/native-readers-extending-the-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>Ddorda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6001#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>soon Hebrew and Arabic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>soon Hebrew and Arabic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

