Comments on: This week in design – 23 July 2010 http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/this-week-in-design-23-july-2010/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:55:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Akshat Jain http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/this-week-in-design-23-july-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1798 Akshat Jain Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:03:12 +0000 http://design.canonical.com/?p=6104#comment-1798 On the stack exchange not foss issue-One of the devs said that they will eventually open-source it,Maybe they are going launchpad way(proprietary at first until you get a significant userbase and then open source it so that no major implementations pop up. On the stack exchange not foss issue-One of the devs said that they will eventually open-source it,Maybe they are going launchpad way(proprietary at first until you get a significant userbase and then open source it so that no major implementations pop up.

]]> By: papapep http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/this-week-in-design-23-july-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1747 papapep Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:47:25 +0000 http://design.canonical.com/?p=6104#comment-1747 At the top right of this page I read "We aim to create discussion...". This is a monologue, you do what you want, you should change the sentence. No open source alternative public discussion, and obviate completely the negative comments is not exactly a discussion. And to have 100% of commitments in the Area51 of people that (not all, obviously, but mostly) don't know what they are doing and they just follow what an Ubuntu blog has posted, it's not "exactly" the community. Ask to the loco's and most involved people, then you will be able to say that you have a real community support. At the top right of this page I read “We aim to create discussion…”. This is a monologue, you do what you want, you should change the sentence. No open source alternative public discussion, and obviate completely the negative comments is not exactly a discussion.

And to have 100% of commitments in the Area51 of people that (not all, obviously, but mostly) don’t know what they are doing and they just follow what an Ubuntu blog has posted, it’s not “exactly” the community. Ask to the loco’s and most involved people, then you will be able to say that you have a real community support.

]]> By: Christian Giordano http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/this-week-in-design-23-july-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1745 Christian Giordano Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:00:22 +0000 http://design.canonical.com/?p=6104#comment-1745 @manuel, now is fixed, thanks! @manuel, now is fixed, thanks!

]]> By: Manuel R. Ciosici http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/this-week-in-design-23-july-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1744 Manuel R. Ciosici Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:58:52 +0000 http://design.canonical.com/?p=6104#comment-1744 @Duncan I think it's related to the meter on the Stackexchange site. @Iain Farrell The link on the Stackexchange picture goes to a 404. :) @Duncan
I think it’s related to the meter on the Stackexchange site.

@Iain Farrell
The link on the Stackexchange picture goes to a 404. :)

]]> By: duncan http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/this-week-in-design-23-july-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1742 duncan Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:43:37 +0000 http://design.canonical.com/?p=6104#comment-1742 I'm curious. I've heard many community members object to the Stack Exchange idea. How does some members objecting to it equal a "100% commitment from community members"? I’m curious. I’ve heard many community members object to the Stack Exchange idea. How does some members objecting to it equal a “100% commitment from community members”?

]]>