<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Font Beta: now with added Bold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/ubuntu-font-beta-now-with-added-bold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/ubuntu-font-beta-now-with-added-bold/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: d2kx</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/ubuntu-font-beta-now-with-added-bold/comment-page-1/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>d2kx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6571#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>I am not part of the beta program, but do you recommend to change rendering settings (subpixel, hinting etc.) with this font compared to the previous one (DejaVu Sans) once released?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not part of the beta program, but do you recommend to change rendering settings (subpixel, hinting etc.) with this font compared to the previous one (DejaVu Sans) once released?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disponible Ubuntu Beta Font en negrita &#171; Elavdeveloper</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/ubuntu-font-beta-now-with-added-bold/comment-page-1/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>Disponible Ubuntu Beta Font en negrita &#171; Elavdeveloper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6571#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>[...] ya se anunció en el blog oficial de diséñadores de Canonical, ya está disponible la nueva fuente de Ubuntu en la [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ya se anunció en el blog oficial de diséñadores de Canonical, ya está disponible la nueva fuente de Ubuntu en la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elavdeveloper</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/ubuntu-font-beta-now-with-added-bold/comment-page-1/#comment-2037</link>
		<dc:creator>elavdeveloper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6571#comment-2037</guid>
		<description>It is the first time I see that a product will ultimately be for all, remains in evidence only for a select group of users. Anyway, I hope to finish soon as evidence that other men can enjoy the fullness of this typography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the first time I see that a product will ultimately be for all, remains in evidence only for a select group of users. Anyway, I hope to finish soon as evidence that other men can enjoy the fullness of this typography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dieki</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/ubuntu-font-beta-now-with-added-bold/comment-page-1/#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6571#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, there is no list that contains every one of the Ubuntu Members. This was probably the best way to get the news to all of them. Plus, it&#039;s public, which makes everything feel less secretive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, there is no list that contains every one of the Ubuntu Members. This was probably the best way to get the news to all of them. Plus, it&#8217;s public, which makes everything feel less secretive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w1ngnut</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/ubuntu-font-beta-now-with-added-bold/comment-page-1/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>w1ngnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6571#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>@Dieki, if only Ubuntu members have access, why post this? Why not send an email to a private-dev list. If at least a screenshot was provide, then fine....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dieki, if only Ubuntu members have access, why post this? Why not send an email to a private-dev list. If at least a screenshot was provide, then fine&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dieki</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/ubuntu-font-beta-now-with-added-bold/comment-page-1/#comment-2020</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6571#comment-2020</guid>
		<description>@Erigami:
Only Ubuntu Members have access to the PPA at the moment, and they all have links already.

@Ivanka Can us mere mortals see a screenshot of the font in Bold? Please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Erigami:<br />
Only Ubuntu Members have access to the PPA at the moment, and they all have links already.</p>
<p>@Ivanka Can us mere mortals see a screenshot of the font in Bold? Please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erigami</title>
		<link>http://design.canonical.com/2010/07/ubuntu-font-beta-now-with-added-bold/comment-page-1/#comment-2019</link>
		<dc:creator>Erigami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://design.canonical.com/?p=6571#comment-2019</guid>
		<description>How about a link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

