In this latest post from Dalton Maag Lukas Paltram updates us on the development thinking that went into the italics in the new Ubuntu font family.
The design of the regular weight of the Ubuntu font, in all three script systems, was a big step forward. All design principles were defined and fixed. We could now proceed to it’s close companion, Ubuntu italic.
The first trials for the Italic were concerned primarily with the question whether this should be simply a slanted and refined version of the regular style, typical for grotesque and geometric font styles, or should it be a classic, true Italic as we know it from serif and humanist sans serif fonts. We felt that only a true italic could satisfy the design of the Ubuntu font.
In typography, the purpose of the italic is to emphasise certain words or sentences. Therefore, a textural difference to the regular is important. The italic angle is of course the most obvious difference but in addition a slight reduction of width further helps to differentiate the italic.
Italic fonts have their roots in cursive handwriting and accordingly some characters have different shapes to the upright version. This is most obvious in the characters a, e, f or g, for example. As Latin script readers we are used to seeing these alternative glyph shapes and they are perfectly legible. Yet Ubuntu is a multilingual typeface, and we also had to consider other scripts and the changes that a switch to the cursive structure would bring to them. So, how does that affect Greek and Cyrillic letters, or other characters that we are not so familiar with?
The principle of the regular design is simplicity and clarity. This principle needed to be carried across to the italic design, so we introduced just enough true italic elements to give it its own warm and human character without compromising on simplicity and clarity.
Lukas Paltram
Why does the italicized æ look so much like œ?
Yap I agree with David and in some language it can be disturbing and you can lose the meaning of a word if you read the æ as an œ…
@Jaques and @David – These sound like an ideal bug candidate. Head over to fonttest.design.canonical.com and submit bugs for us to review. Thanks for your feedback.
I’m on launchpad filling the bug right now…
When will support Arabic fonts ?
Instead of more weights there should be a narrow face.
I find it looks really nice for text on webpages, but for GUI use it makes the strings too long.
It looks excellent as a GUI font. I’m really interested in how the monospace one turns out.
How much of the Unicode charset will be supported? Will Hebrew be supported?
Cursive “yat” looks so cute:) It is really cursive yat, I saw it in notes of father of my grandmoter.
For those following along, the bug that Jacques filed is:
This was fixed a month later (September 2009): proof that with an open font process it’s possible to fix niggles like these!
Tobias: We can have more weights and a narrow-version! It’s called Ubuntu Condensed and (as of September 2011) is currently in the main Beta Test Team PPA (which you’re welcome to join).
OMGUbuntu have a write-up too: Condensed Variant of Ubuntu Font Debuts (2011-08-02).
I was just wondering the same thing.